neuralgap.io
The term “big data” has historically been encapsulated by the three Vs: Volume, Velocity, and Variety. Volume refers to the sheer amount of data being generated and stored; it’s the most apparent characteristic that defines data as “big.” Velocity denotes the speed at which new data is produced and the pace at which it moves through systems. Variety speaks to the diverse types of data, from structured numeric data in traditional databases to unstructured text, images, and more. These dimensions have served as a foundation for understanding the challenges and opportunities inherent in managing large datasets.
Let’s put this into perspective, by considering a naive range between 100,000 data points, which might represent a modest dataset by today’s standards, and 1 billion data points, a volume that challenges even sophisticated analysis tools and storage systems. This vast range highlights the practical implications of big data: as datasets grow from one end of the spectrum to the other, the complexity of processing, analyzing, and deriving insights increases exponentially, necessitating more advanced computational techniques and infrastructures. For the context of the rest of this article – we are going to assume that you already have basic knowledge about data and its attributes.
Big data’s complexity extends far beyond its volume, challenging our traditional understanding and approaches. Two critical aspects that significantly influence data management and analysis strategies are high dimensionality and data sparsity.
Ensuring data quality and cleanliness becomes exponentially more difficult as datasets grow. Issues such as incomplete records, inaccuracies, duplicates, and outdated information can severely impact the insights derived from big data.
Challenges with Setting Up an ETL Pipeline: Establishing an efficient Extracting, Transforming, and Loading (ETL) pipeline presents numerous challenges, especially when dealing with big data. The pipeline must be designed to handle the vast volume of data constantly and efficiently, ensure the integrity and cleanliness of the data throughout the process, and be flexible enough to accommodate changes in data sources and formats. Take as an example a healthcare dataset with 10 million patient records. In this dataset, suppose that 0.5% of the records contain critical inaccuracies in patient diagnosis codes, and 2% of records are duplicates due to patients receiving care at multiple facilities within the same network. These issues, although seemingly small in percentage terms, translate to 50,000 records with incorrect diagnoses and 200,000 duplicate records, however the transform process required to solve this still is required to sift through all 10 million of the dataset just to catch those (and avoid Type II errors, also known as false negatives).
Timing and activity synchronization: One of the more subtle yet pervasive challenges in managing global datasets is timing and activity synchronization. This issue arises from the need to accurately align and interpret timestamped data collected from different time zones. For instance, a purchase made at 12 AM in New York (GMT-4) corresponds to 9 AM in Tokyo (GMT+9). Without proper synchronization, activities that span multiple time zones can lead to misleading analyses, such as underestimating peak activity hours or misaligning transaction sequences. To address this, data engineers must implement robust time synchronization techniques that account for the complexities of global timekeeping, such as daylight saving adjustments and time zone differences. This might involve converting all timestamps to a standard time zone, like UTC, during the ETL process, and ensuring that all data analysis tools are aware of and can correctly interpret these standardized timestamps. However, even with these measures, challenges persist in ensuring that time-sensitive data analyses accurately reflect the intended temporal relationships and behaviors.
Data Aging and Historical Integrity: Data aging refers to the process by which data becomes less relevant or accurate as time passes, potentially leading to misleading conclusions if not managed properly. Maintaining historical integrity involves not just preserving data but also ensuring it remains meaningful and accurate within its intended context (remember, archiving data is also expensive and accumulative). Deciding what data to archive, when to archive it, at what frequency (e.g. you might not need to archive on a hourly basis as perhaps daily or weekly would be more appropriate) is a complex task. For example, consider a retail company collecting customer transaction data for over a decade. Over time, purchasing patterns, product preferences, and customer demographics may shift significantly and simply retaining all historical transaction data without considering its current relevance can lead to skewed analyses, and also racks up cumulative costs. On the other hand, purging data too aggressively might erase valuable insights into long-term trends or cyclic patterns.
The above subsections are illustrative examples and are by no means exhaustive. Nevertheless, we hope this article has sparked more insight into the processes and challenges that have to be handled with big data implementation in practice.
At Neuralgap - we deal daily with the challenges and difficulties in implementing, running and mining data for insight. Neuralgap is focussed on enabling transformative AI-assisted Data Analytics mining to enable ramp-up/ramp-down mining insights to cater to the data ingestion requirements of our clients.
Our flagship product, Forager, is an intelligent big data analytics platform that democratizes the analysis of corporate big data, enabling users of any experience level to unearth actionable insights from large datasets. Equipped with an intelligent UI that takes cues from mind maps and decision trees, Forager facilitates a seamless interaction between the user and the machine, employing the advanced capabilities of modern LLMs with that of very highly optimized mining modules. This allows for not only the interpretation of complex data queries but also the anticipation of analytical needs, evolving iteratively with each user interaction.
If you are interested in seeing how you could use Neuralgap Forager, or even for a custom project related to very high-end AI and Analytics deployment, visit us at https://neuralgap.io/